Is your business truly ready to let AI take the reins? A new report on the AI adoption across organizations found that 95% of corporate generative AI pilots fail to deliver any meaningful financial impact, with only 5% achieving rapid revenue acceleration. The excitement around generative AI and its potential to unlock a new era of work is palpable, and businesses are gunning to master this technology before competitors.
Despite that, the process of adopting gen AI and other adjacent tools has not been smooth for the large majority of businesses. The reason for the poor AI adoption success rates is not the quality of AI—which admittedly has not reached its full potential just yet—but the “learning gap” that persists within organizations.
Image: Pexels
95% of Generative AI Pilots Fail—This Transition Cannot Be Rushed
The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025 report, published by MIT’s NANDA initiative, recently investigated the adoption of AI among businesses, and its findings painted a concerning picture. The study found that while many businesses had explored AI, 95% of their AI pilots had failed to deliver substantial financial returns.
Speaking to Fortune, Aditya Challapally, the lead author of the report, explained that some large companies and many younger startups were “excelling with generative AI.” Many startups run by younger entrepreneurs saw a significant jump in their revenue. “It’s because they pick one pain point, execute well, and partner smartly with companies who use their tools,” he added as an explanation for their success.
From his analysis of the situation, it is apparent that organizations that have a clear vision for AI and start small are far more likely to succeed in optimizing AI tools than businesses that attempt to do too much, unprepared.
Why Are Businesses Struggling with Generative AI Adoption?
A 95% failure rate for the AI pilots designed to convert investments into results is quite a high number, all things considered. While it might be easier to believe that organizations have vastly overestimated what AI is capable of pulling off, the cause for disappointing results is a different one.
Many companies are faced with a learning gap when it comes to their understanding and utilization of these tools. Previous reports have also shown businesses regretting their fast-paced adoption of AI and the layoffs that were conducted as a result. A rushed adoption of new technology without an understanding of its capabilities or its relevance to the business leaves organizations unprepared for its implementation.
There is also the area of allocation to consider. The generative AI pilot failures occur because more than half of the businesses have been investing their AI budgets in sales and marketing. Meanwhile, application in back-office automation often reaps the best results, clearing up bottlenecks and cutting off excessive expenditure on redundant outsourcing and operations.
AI-Based Success Is Possible with Careful Planning
Despite the high rate of AI pilot failures, investing in AI is by no means a pointless endeavor. There are many ways to apply niche artificial intelligence tools to improve the business’ overall performance, but this cannot occur without careful planning and preparation. A centralized AI team may be able to oversee the adoption of AI tools, but those who are in line to use them also require training and preparation.
Hiring workers skilled in AI for every department is a possible solution to the problem, but it will be a while before such experts can be found from every industry. Instead, equipping workers with the skills and knowledge they need as they put their existing expertise into use is the easiest pathway to seeing success with AI.
MIT NADA’s study also indicated that success with AI is much easier when organizations rely on tools from existing specialized businesses than when they try to build them internally. This is a reasonable conclusion as it allows an organization to rely on more polished tools rather than ones that are untested and unfinished, but ultimately, it is up to the company to determine what is best for them.
The findings outlined by the MIT study serve as a wake-up call for businesses that are trying to benefit from the AI boom. It outlines the fact that buying or building the tools is only one aspect of integration, as preparing the workforce for their use is just as critical to their successful adoption. One without the other may continue to lead to disappointing results.
Subscribe to The HR Digest for more insights into the evolving landscape of work and employment right now.